Few politicians, judges, or scholars can ever be dissuaded from portraying the nation’s architects not as people, but as walking treatises on political philosophy, a sort of gaggle of latter-day Athenians in tricorn hats. Thus, the Founders’ disagreements become more academic than personal or petty, and in most cases, eventually subordinated to the needs of the nation.
Haha. Agreed. Writing with a quill pen probably prompted quirks. Federalist 10 is definitely a fine piece of writing, as long as it is kept in context...which most Con Law profs and political theorists do not.
And, yeah, I should have linked to the book, but I wasn't sure how to do it. I'm a tech moron. It's available on Amazon, however...(hint, hint?)
But that link’s not right either. Sorry.
Imperfect Union: How Errors of Omission Threaten Constitutional Democracyhttps://a.co/d/2aysfAE
Wow!
If you're still curious, haha.
https://www.amazon.com/Imperfect-Union-Omission-Constitutional-Democracy/dp/1680538438/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
All true. Yet, I still love federalist 10 for its prose and for its truths about human nature.
And you ought to link to your book!
Finally, Hamilton apparently never met a comma he didn't like!
Haha. Agreed. Writing with a quill pen probably prompted quirks. Federalist 10 is definitely a fine piece of writing, as long as it is kept in context...which most Con Law profs and political theorists do not.
And, yeah, I should have linked to the book, but I wasn't sure how to do it. I'm a tech moron. It's available on Amazon, however...(hint, hint?)